Defining Competencies and Outcomes
Improve your course clarity with competencies and outcomes. Learn how to break down complex skills into measurable parts for better student understanding and success.
By Gwenna Moss Centre for Teaching and LearningAlthough there is no widely accepted distinction between a competency and an outcome, there is sufficient commonality for the following working definition to be used to improve the structure and clarity of courses and programs.
A competency is an overarching capability the learner can do. Examples include critical thinking, problem solving, effective communication, design functions, or physical performative skills. Since a competency is generally too complex to measure on its own, it must be broken down into its core, and often interconnected, measurable outcomes (sometimes called objectives).
Learning outcomes, are the core measurable components that together make up the competency.
A competency is more than silos of outcomes. The complexity of a competency exists through the intertwining of the outcomes.
Let's look at the example of driving:
Competency: | The ability to operate a motor vehicle safely and efficiently. |
Outcomes: | - Knowledge of and adherence to traffic laws. - Maintain proper vehicle handling and control. - The ability to make quick and effective decisions in various driving situations. - Assess potential hazards on the road and take appropriate action to avoid or mitigate them. |
To meet the complexity of driving, it is not sufficient to consider adherence to traffic laws in isolation of making decisions in various driving situations. The outcomes are connected to each other and the larger competency. |
*See further examples below
“How many competencies and outcomes do I need in a course?”
There is no widely agreed upon number of each. Variations might include: 1) one competency and nine outcomes, or 2) two competencies with 3-outcomes for the first competency and 5-outcomes for the second competency. However, for a 3 credit-unit course that occurs over three months or 12 full weeks, a a recommended guideline is:
If each of your competencies has an equitable focus, it is reasonable to have three competencies per course, with three outcomes per competency.
This generalization will vary, depending on the size and scope of each competency. Keep the overall course outcomes limited to no more than 10 (less is better) so students have time to practice, get feedback, and improve throughout the course.
If you find you have too many competencies and/or outcomes, consider the following questions:
- What are the overarching “themes” of the course?
- Am I including content that is “nice to know” but not “essential to know”?
- Does the course allow time for the student to gain feedback and apply their knowledge for deep
- understanding? If not, refer to the first bullet point.
- Is it more important for me to cover a broad amount of content or that a student understands limited content more deeply? Deep understanding will take more time. Refer back to the first bullet point.
- Do you have outcomes that can be combined for a more targeted focus?
Competency and outcomes examples
Humanities example Source: Saskatchewan Curriculum
Competency: | Understand the foundations of Canadian Law |
Outcomes: |
|
Research example Source: SENS Micro-credential: Foundations of Collaborative Community Research
Competency: | Designing collaborative community engagement to address sustainability challenges. |
Outcomes: |
|
Calculus example Source: Saskatchewan Curriculum
Competency: | Demonstrate understanding of differentiation based on slope as a rate of change. |
Outcomes: |
|
Full Course example
Competency #1: | Application of Learning Theories: Apply online learning theories to design effective and engaging course content and instruction. |
Outcomes |
|
Competency #2: | Instructional Design: Design an e-learning module using best research-based practices |
Outcomes for Competency 2 |
|
Competency #3: | Using Technology to support online learning |
Outcomes for Competency 3 |
|